CP2K Open Source Molecular Dynamics

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
exercises:2014_ethz_mmm:ls_scf

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
exercise:ls_dft [2014/04/30 14:26] – oschuettls_scf [2014/04/30 14:27] – exercise:ls_dft renamed to ls_scf oschuett
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Linear Scaling Self Consisted Field Methods ======+====== Linear Scaling Self Consistent Field Methods ======
  
 In this exercise we will compare linear scaling with normal SCF methods. We will run simulations on a 2D polymer system containing up to 2400 atoms. The 2D polymer system is described in more detail in this recent publication [[doi>10.1002/adma.201304705]]. To make this exercise computationally feasible, will us the efficient Density Functional based Tight Binding (DFTB) method. It requires only a minima basis, but delivers nevertheless reasonable results due to an empirical correction term called //repulsion potential//. In this exercise we will compare linear scaling with normal SCF methods. We will run simulations on a 2D polymer system containing up to 2400 atoms. The 2D polymer system is described in more detail in this recent publication [[doi>10.1002/adma.201304705]]. To make this exercise computationally feasible, will us the efficient Density Functional based Tight Binding (DFTB) method. It requires only a minima basis, but delivers nevertheless reasonable results due to an empirical correction term called //repulsion potential//.
exercises/2014_ethz_mmm/ls_scf.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 by 127.0.0.1