User Tools

Site Tools


exercises:2016_uzh_cmest:defects_in_graphene

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
exercises:2016_uzh_cmest:defects_in_graphene [2016/11/14 08:22] – [Oxygen atom adsorbed on graphene] tmuellerexercises:2016_uzh_cmest:defects_in_graphene [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 5: Line 5:
 <note tip>When comparing scaled coordinates between papers and code input scripts, always make sure that they use the same coordinate systems and definitions for a unit cell (both real and reciprocal space). For example while many sources (like the [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025610002697|paper of Curtarolo, Setyawan]]) assume a 120° degree angle between $a$ and $b$ for a hexagonal cell, you can also define it to be a 60° angle (like the default in CP2K).</note> <note tip>When comparing scaled coordinates between papers and code input scripts, always make sure that they use the same coordinate systems and definitions for a unit cell (both real and reciprocal space). For example while many sources (like the [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025610002697|paper of Curtarolo, Setyawan]]) assume a 120° degree angle between $a$ and $b$ for a hexagonal cell, you can also define it to be a 60° angle (like the default in CP2K).</note>
  
 +
 +<note important>Once you have verified that your calculation setup works, use ''nohup mpirun -np 8 cp2k.popt ... &'' to run the calculations in parallel and in the background since they may take longer to complete than before.</note>
  
 ====== Vacancy in graphene ====== ====== Vacancy in graphene ======
Line 16: Line 18:
 Quick question: Does it matter which carbon atom you remove? (hint: what kind of boundary conditions do we impose?) Quick question: Does it matter which carbon atom you remove? (hint: what kind of boundary conditions do we impose?)
  
-Calculate the energy of the vacancy formation, that is $E_v = E_2 (N-1)/N \cdot E_1$ where $E_1$ is the energy of the complete system, $E_2$ that of the system with a vacancy and $N$ the number of atoms.+Calculate the energy of the vacancy formation, that is $E_v = E_2 - \frac{N-1}{N\cdot E_1$ where $E_1$ is the energy of the complete system, $E_2$ that of the system with a vacancy and $N$ the number of atoms.
  
 ===== Analyze the PDOS ===== ===== Analyze the PDOS =====
Line 30: Line 32:
 Now we are going to investigate the effect an adsorbent has on graphene. Now we are going to investigate the effect an adsorbent has on graphene.
  
-====== Change in energy ======+===== Change in energy =====
  
  
 In order to adsorb an oxygen atom on top of a graphene layer, modify the coordinate section by adding one oxygen atom which has them same coordinates as a carbon (except the z-component of course). Check whether the addition of an oxygen atom has an effect on the structure of graphene by optimizing its geometry and calculate the adsorption energy. In order to adsorb an oxygen atom on top of a graphene layer, modify the coordinate section by adding one oxygen atom which has them same coordinates as a carbon (except the z-component of course). Check whether the addition of an oxygen atom has an effect on the structure of graphene by optimizing its geometry and calculate the adsorption energy.
  
-Use:+Use $E_\text{ad} = E_3 – (E_1 + \frac{1}{2}E_2)$, with: 
 + 
 +  ; $E_\text{ad}$ : energy of adsorption 
 +  ; $E_1$ : energy of graphene 
 +  ; $E_2$ : energy of molecular oxygen (-31.929714235694995 a.u.) 
 +  ; $E_3$ : energy of oxygen adsorbed on graphene 
 + 
 + 
 +<note tip>The formation of oxygen is more difficult to obtain, here we use $\frac{1}{2}$ of the total energy of molecular oxygen. This approximation introduces a large uncertainty to our calculations because the calculation of dioxygen is difficult using KS-DFT. 
 + 
 +Try to explain based on the lecture what might be the problem.</note> 
 +===== Displacements ===== 
 + 
 +We are furthermore interested in the change of structure this adsorbent causes. Try to visualize which atoms have to assume a new position in order to minimize the total energy. That is: plot $\sqrt{(x^i-x^i_0)^2 + (y^i-y^i_0)^2 + (z^i-z^i_0)^2}$ in a sensible manner (one which also retains the geometry of graphene). 
 + 
 + 
 +======= Analyzing defects in hexagonal Boron-Nitride ======= 
 + 
 +Repeat the calculations of the vacancy formation, defect formation and adsorption for the h-BN-layer structure, taking into account that now both the N and the B can be replaced. 
 + 
 +Compare the energies for the two cases, where is a vacancy more likely to be and on top of which atom does an oxygen atom preferably adsorb.
  
-; $E_\text{ad}$ : energy of adsorption +<note tip>Use the total energy of a B or N atom when calculating the vacancy formation energy.</note>
-; $E_1$ : energy of graphene +
-; $E_2$ : energy of molecular oxygen (-31.929714235694995 a.u.) +
-; $E_3$ : energy of oxygen adsorbed on graphene+
  
-and $E\text{ad} = E_3 – (E_1 + \frac{1}{2}E_2)$.+Since N and B are radicals, you have to include the following keywords/options in the right places (use the CP2K manual):
  
-====== Displacements ======+  * ''UKS .TRUE.'' 
 +  * ''MULITPLCITY ...''
  
-We are furthermore interested in the change of structure this adsorbent causes. Try to visualize which atoms have to adopt a new position in order to minimize the total energy. That is: plot $\sqrt{(x^i-x^i_0)^2 + (y^i-y^i_0)^2 + (z^i-z^i_0)^2}$ in a sensible manner (one which also retains the geometry of graphene). 
exercises/2016_uzh_cmest/defects_in_graphene.1479111725.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 (external edit)